Ethical Leadership, Scientific Integrity, and Transparent Peer Review Practices

Fair Decisions

Fair Editorial Decisions

Editors must evaluate submissions solely on academic merit, originality, and relevance, regardless of authors' institutional or personal background.

Ethics

Upholding Ethical Standards

Editors are responsible for identifying misconduct (plagiarism, data manipulation, authorship fraud) and initiating appropriate corrective actions.

Confidentiality

Maintaining Confidentiality

All manuscripts must be treated as confidential. Editors must not disclose content to any third party except reviewers or editorial staff.

Reviewer Selection

Reviewer Assignment

Editors assign manuscripts to qualified, unbiased reviewers and ensure timely, constructive evaluations through a transparent review process.

Conflict Management

Conflict of Interest Oversight

Editors must avoid handling manuscripts where there is a conflict of interest and disclose any such affiliations to the editorial team.

Corrections

Correction & Retraction Duties

When needed, editors must issue corrections, retractions, or expressions of concern following COPE’s retraction guidelines.

Accountability and Transparency

Editors are ultimately accountable for the quality and integrity of the journal. They work collaboratively with the editorial office, peer reviewers, and the publisher to ensure compliance with international standards, including COPE, DOAJ, and OASPA.

Need Editorial Assistance?

If you are an editor in need of guidance or ethical consultation, contact our team at [email protected].